 
|
Houses Under Fifty
Thousand |
Buy Or Rent?
To buy or to rent? It all depends
on your circumstances, and on the real estate market where you
are. I once sold a home for a young couple who owed as much as
the sales price. They had to take money from savings just to
pay the closing costs and sales commission. I am sure they wish
they had rented for the couple years they lived there.
That story brings up the first
thing to consider when comparing buying versus renting: the time
you will be there. The process of buying and later selling a
home will usually cost about 10% or more of the value of the
home. In other words, if the home only went up in value 10% or
so in the year or two you lived there, you won't be gaining anything
in the end (equity gain from principal pay-down is very little
in the first years). Generally you are better off renting if
you'll be in a town for less than a few years.
What about faster appreciation?
It happens, but have you done some serious homework? If not,
assuming appreciation will be more than the general rate of inflation
is just gambling. In the example above, the sellers sold for
the same price they bought for two years earlier - and this was
in a decent and growing area. You can't count on fast appreciation
just because it has been that way recently.
Buy Or Rent - The Cost
Comparison
Comparing buying versus renting,
you have to take into account that in many places it cost much
more to buy. For example, in Tucson, Arizona a small home costs
$200,000 or more. The mortgage payment, taxes, insurance and
maintenance will usually add up to about $1,600 per month. You
can rent the same size home for about $800.
What does this mean? Real estate
fanatics will tell you that you are at least buying something
for your money, and that renting is throwing your money away.
Of course more than $1,000 of your payment will be going towards
interest alone in this example. That's not buying you anything.
Consider this: What if you could
afford the $1600 per month, but instead you rented for $800 and
put the other $800 into a decent safe investment that made you
5%? In three years you would have over $30,000 in this account.
Assuming that the home appreciated at 6% per year ( it has been
more like 25% per year recently, but that can't continue, and
assuming so is not planning, but gambling), it would be worth
$231,000. But the costs of initially buying it and then selling
it would likely be around $13,800 (2% buying and 6% selling),
leaving you with a gain of about 19,000 once we include your
principal pay-down.
Did you get that? You would be
at least $11,000 better off if you rented and banked the difference.
Of course every market is different. You have to do the math,
comparing the total costs of owning versus renting, and then
making safe assumptions about the rate of appreciation for homes.
In the end, if you will definitely
be in one place for a long time to come, it will most likely
be better to buy than to rent. Even in the last example, buying
becomes a better bet after about four or five years. Another
factor to consider is that if you get a fixed rate mortgage,
your payment will never change. Landlords won't offer you that
on your rent payment.
Look at the time you'll be there,
the comparison of total monthly costs, whether rents are going
up fast, and whether you have good reason to believe home prices
will be going up fast. Look also at all the personal factors.
Do you want to be responsible for the maintenance, yard work
and unpredictability of ownership problems? To buy or to rent?
In the end, you have to work this one out by yourself.
Houses Under
Fifty Thousand | Buy Or Rent? |