Cities wth Inexpensive Houses
If your search for inexpensive houses is for the cheapest
of the cheap, you can find some of those on the following pages:
Where To Find Cheap Homes
- Places with houses priced under fifty thousand dollars or so.
Cheap Houses: More Places
- Places where the homes sell for less than $30,000.
Cheap Towns to Live In
- A 2011 update on many towns and cities with inexpensive homes.
This page is about inexpensive houses, but the focus is on
those that are most likely to be a great value as well. In other
words, a home that is $100,000, but is in an under-priced locale
that will see good gains in prices is a better value than a $50,000
home that will sell for even less in five years. For those who
read this in the future, note that I am writing it in 2010.
What makes a good housing value? As pointed out, it isn't
price alone. In fact, one of the most important factors - and
one that home owners often ignore - is the relationship between
home prices and wages in an area. The median home price in the
U.S. was 1.92 times median household income from 1988 to 2003.
Then came the boom years, when that figure went to 2.77 for a
variety of reasons. As you might imagine, when prices twice as
high in relation to incomes, there can be problems. Thus we suddenly
had more foreclosures than ever and falling prices across the
country.
But not all areas were so over-priced to begin with. Then
there are the areas of the country where prices have fallen back
to reasonable levels. So where are the deals now? The following
list is of cities where homes are selling for reasonable prices
according to incomes. If the incomes are high in an area, higher
prices can be sustained over time. If incomes are low, the prices
have to be accordingly low to make it onto this list.
Fort Worth/Arlington, Texas
The price-to-income ratio here was a high 3.95 in the fourth
quarter of 2005. By this year it had fallen all the way down
to 1.89. That's even below the average for the 1990s. Prices
are still falling a bit though, so it may be a better buy in
2011.
Washington, D.C.
Prices here rose quickly and then fell 31% after 2007, bringing
the price-to-income ratio down to 1.12 as of the end of 2009.
The average was 1.69 from 1988 to 2003, so the current prices
are likely to be near a bottom. Keep in kind, though, that the
ratio is based on the high average incomes in the area. If you
do not have one of the high income jobs, the prices will not
seem that affordable. In that case, you'll want to look at good
values that are also very cheap, which brings us to our next
locale for inexpensive houses...
Fayetteville, North Carolina
The boom never really came to town here, and homes remain
affordable at a price-to-income ratio of 1.23, based on low incomes.
In fact, as of May 2010, there are a number of two-bedroom homes
here that start at under $20,000. With a previous ratio of 1.52
for the 15 years ending in 2003, it seems likely that prices
will go up from the current levels.
Las Cruces, New Mexico
In the first months of 2006 the price-to-income ratio was
a very high 3.03, and has now fallen to just 1.37. This doesn't
mean that rices have fallen by more than half, though. Remember
that this is a ratio, and part of the change can come from rising
incomes. The latter bode well for the future, of course. Meanwhile,
you can still find decent three-bedroom homes here for under
$100,000.
Medford, Oregon
Prices here have dropped by about 25% from the top. This was
due to the same causes as in the rest of the country, but also
because the local timber industry had to shed jobs as the new-home
market collapsed across the United States. The reason that prices
did not fall further is that they were already low to begin with.
The current price-to-income ratio is around 1, making it the
lowest on our list. There are currently two-bedroom homes starting
in the 50s and 3 bedroom homes starting in the 70s.
Inexpensive Houses - Other Locations
Here are a few of the other places where the price-to-income
ratio is back to reasonable (or where it never was too inflated
in the first place.
Cincinnati, Ohio: Price-to-income ratio of 1.41 versus
an average of 1.46 from 1988 to 2003.
Mobile, Alabama: Price-to-income ratio of 1.52 versus
an average of 2.18 from 1988 to 2003.
Phoenix, Arizona: Price-to-income ratio of 1.52 versus
an average of 1.74 from 1988 to 2003.
Memphis, Tennessee: Price-to-income ratio of 1.17 versus
an average of 2.13 from 1988 to 2003.
See the latest updates for 2012, with a look at inexpensive
houses (in absolute terms), here: The
Cheapest Homes in 2012.
|